The effect of mid-focused and unfocused written corrections on the acquisition of grammatical structures

Ahsan Pashazadeh


Studies that have reported delayed positive effects for written corrective feedback (WCF) have typically targeted the use of articles for first- and subsequent-mention functions, using narrowly focused corrections that lack ecological validity. Not much is known about how different grammatical features react to mid-focused and unfocused WCF options, which enjoy more ecological validity. This study investigates the delayed effect of different types of WCF on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' accurate use of three features of English grammar (articles, infinitive, and unreal conditional). Four groups of participants (N = 77) were treated with different feedback options (mid-focused corrections, unfocused corrections, unfocused corrections plus revision, and no corrective feedback). WCF did not produce lasting accuracy gains, nor did it help corrected students outperform uncorrected students on a delayed posttest. 

Full Text:



  • There are currently no refbacks.



Grant Eckstein

Betsy Gilliland

(Brigham Young University)

(University of Hawai'i)

Editorial Board:Dana Ferris(University of California, Davis)
 John Bitchner(Auckland University of Technology)
 Norman Evans(Brigham Young University)
 Lynn Goldstein(Monterey Institute of International Studies)
 James Hartshorn(Brigham Young University)
 Fiona Hyland(The University of Hong Kong)
 Kendon Kurzer(University of California, Davis)
 Icy Lee(The Chinese University of Hong Kong)
 Karen Lunsford(University of California, Santa Barbara)
  Lucie Moussu(University of Alberta)